UBB.Developers Forums Community Development Programming HTML, CSS, and JavaScript Basic CSS and the UBB

I want to work on replacing the redundant font tags in the templates with some basic css that reads the styles set in the style template and uses those values for the fonts.

Here's what I've done so far:

In public_common.pl, I've set the css to look like this:


I've then went through and replaced all :

with


There are >300 instances of just this one set of tags in the templates - bandwidth and download speed should improve...

My problem is that the pages do not seem to be picking up on these styles, as the text sizes are bigger than specified... ideas? Is it because the ubb uses size="2" instead of pixels or x-small?

I am using IE6 to view the results...

You can use pixels (like 80pt), percents (like 80%) or x-small/etc..

[ September 03, 2001: Message edited by: LK ]

and there lies the rub, since ubb uses 1, 2, and 3 everywhere, it's not gonna be a matter of just reading the already set values in the styles...

ah well... it's just one extra step... should make a nice difference in download speed and bandwidth improvement. I'll add this as part of the xhtml templates or seperately but with using xhtml templates as the base

BTW, I don't think Xpts are CSS v1.0 validated.

80pt would be 80 points, not 80 pixels. But in response to Allen's initial question, CSS and HTML font sizes are not the same. CSS needs the number to be accompanied by a unit, and 10pt is roughly a 2 in HTML sizing.

hmmmm...

thanks, both of ye... that explains the ugly I was seeing

Close?:
1 == 8pt == xx-small
2 == 10pt == x-small
3 == 12pt == small

Gonna read a little more at ALA, they had some weird stuff going on to make it appear the same in most all browsers...


I'll distribute the templates with the css manually set, maybe in the future include a control panel add-on that allows you to set it from the cp.

more... can I mix css class with other tags?

example... I have a a good number of fonts set that are exactly alike except they give a different text color... can I do something like:



Or do I need a different css class set for each font tag that uses a different color?

without that COLOR part

Also, I think STRICT means

I didn't give up on this (and you thought I was taking a long time on the portal ) - I started css'ing the templates for 6.3 and am seeing a ~10% savings in file size which should translate into a significant gain in bandwidth savings. They should be ready when 6.3 goes final

Can you post the CSS you're currently working with? I hope it's not the same as what you posted back in the first post of this thread...

hehe

check the thread in the dev forum for more details. will post it publicly as there is more to post

Not using 6.3, but I did the same thing for UBB6.05 a couple of weeks ago.

Difference being is that I've made it an external stylesheet, and it replaces UBB's "Templates", so you configure everything in the stylesheet.

Anyway, our stylesheet looks like this

[code][/code]The whole template updating took me probably around 5 hours in total to modify.
I would make a hack out of it, but it does require a lot of intelligence when installing other hacks, to make sure they comply with the stylesheet.

Allen, If you want, I can email you our highly modified templates, so you can use them to compare with, to make sure you get all the sections updated.

As far as I can tell i've covered all areas with it

Cheers

Ben/PF

thanks, it looks good

I'll be using 6.3's templates, which are a good bit different from 6.05's in some places, not so bad in others. I'll also be using ubb.threads' css naming scheme with a bit simpler .css file than yours - it'll help tremendously for those switching from one to another and it's one a lot of people (including me ) are used to, I know what's where

Once I start posting the template files publicly, I would value your input tho, when you have time

jordo: that code looks good; glad to see you know about how the "cascade" in cascading style sheets works.

Allen: use tags instead for doing that.

thanks both of you